September 13, 2012 • 10:45 am
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
Nigerian Cover Project
Flickr Photos
|
Vimeo
Tumblr
Links
- 33rev
- 6moons Audio Reviews
- Alternate Takes
- Bowers & Wilkins
- Computer Audiophile
- DeVore Fidelity
- Elements of Jazz
- In Living Stereo
- London Jazz Collector
- Music Matters – Blue Note 45 rpm Reissue Series
- Naxos USA
- Stereo Exchange
- Stereo Times
- Tim Enjoys Records
- Tom Powers Jazz House
- Tone Imports
- Vinylphile Magazine
Theme: Grid Focus by Derek Punsalan.
Thanks for passing along this. It is the best analysis of “privacy” problem for makers of traditional media trying to market a digital version of their work, I’ve seen.
To protect them, it seems Google and other ad networks, need to be held responsible for where their ads appear. And sites distributing media need to be held responsible for unauthorized uploads. This protection could be done with legislation without crippling our computers or the network. And should be done for this transitionary period.
But, really creatives, the solution is to make media that cannot be stolen, because all distribution is authorized. Make media that uses ubiquitous access to promote your interests.
Don’t make digital media that needs to be sold. Get yourself and everyone involved paid first, then use digital media to sell services, events, and analogue products, that further everyone’s ability to get paid to make more media.
Then, “pirates” are simply distributors.
Thanks for the insight p0ps. Cheers.